← About ChiroTrack

Corrections

Corrections

When something we published was wrong, it is recorded here: what was published, what was wrong with it, what replaced it, and the date. Entries are added, never softened or taken down.

Testimonials, ratings and endorsements that had no source

Corrected September 23, 2026 · 31 pages · published from February 14, 2026

What was published

Thirty-seven testimonials, each shown with a name and a role, many with a five-star rating:

  • contribute.html: 4, attributed to “Dr. Sarah Mitchell, DC”, “Dr. Marcus Johnson, DC”, “Dr. Elena Rodriguez, DC” and “Dr. James Park, DC”
  • the-chirotrack-path.html: 12, including a “Member Reviews” section described as “Mixed text and video reviews from currently enrolled members”
  • the workshop page (the-other-half-chiropractic-workshop-students.html): 6
  • pre-chiro-navigator.html: 4
  • students.html: 4, each with five stars
  • about.html: 3, under the heading “Trusted by Students and Practitioners” and the line “Real feedback from real members working through the modules”
  • pre-health-advisor.html: 3, each with five stars, under “Student Success Stories”
  • checkout.html: 1, with five stars

A representative sample, exactly as published:

  • “I donated my interview series to ChiroTrack because I wanted my 20 years of practice experience to help the next generation avoid the mistakes I made.” (“Dr. Marcus Johnson, DC”)
  • “I transferred schools my first year and felt completely lost. Module 7 alone would have saved me six months of confusion.” (“Jordan M., 3rd Quarter Student”)
  • “M3’s letter templates got me into two clinics in a week. I’d been cold-calling for two months before this with nothing.” (“Elena R., Pre-Chiro · Junior”)
  • “NBCE prep alone was worth the module. I went from anxious to scheduled in two weeks.” (“Avery K., 4th Tri”)
  • “I’m in my second year at Life West and the Chiro Student modules are exactly what I needed.” (“Marcus Rodriguez”, five stars)
  • “The podcast interviews alone are worth it.” (“Jessica Patel, Pre-Chiro Track · Accepted to Palmer”, five stars)
  • “Dr. Ben answers in the forum directly. Not a TA. Him. The week I posted my application timeline, he replied with a redline by morning.” (“Avery K., DC Student · 4th Tri”)
  • “The 1:1 review caught three things in my application I would’ve shipped without.” (“J. Ramirez, Pre-Chiro · UC Davis”, five stars, on the checkout page)

In the same sweep:

  • pre-chiropractic-student-guide.html claimed a “94% chiropractic school acceptance rate”, four times, and said “Join 1,200+ pre-chiro students.”
  • m9.html called one lesson “the highest-rated lesson in M9 according to forum traffic.”
  • pre-health-advisor.html offered advisors “student success stories”.
  • free-resources.html showed Life West, Dynamic Chiropractic, Palmer, Parker, F4CP and Sherman as a row of logos under “Built On Conversations With Practitioners From”.
  • contribute.html promised contributors would be “Featured in our Contributor Spotlight” and that “we’ll be in touch within 48 hours.”

And in our own voice, about students, results and testing:

  • “Every module in this curriculum was field-tested with real students before it was filmed” and “I still answer the forum personally” (the-chirotrack-path.html), and “The lessons are field-tested with real DC students before they get filmed” with “I still answer the forum personally — not through a TA” (m7.html).
  • “Results in week 1: Most students send their first shadowing letter using M3 templates within seven days of joining and have at least one yes by the end of week 2” (the-chirotrack-path.html).
  • “1,000+ students using ChiroTrack”, beside a row of placeholder avatars, on all twelve module pages (Modules 2 to 10.5). There was also a “students-currently-enrolled 1,000+” graphic on m7.html.
  • “Most students who take M1 do continue to M2” (m1.html), “Most students who enroll in M7 are already mid-first-year” (m7.html), “Students consistently report that the lessons reveal new layers” (m8.html), “It does substitute reasonably for most students who can self-direct” (m6.html), and “Tangible Results: Students report greater clarity, confidence, and readiness” (students.html).
  • Module pages describing questions that “come up” in the forum, mentor calls and Live Q&A (m7.html, m9.html, m10.html), as if those sessions had already taken place.
  • The Other Half workshop page (the-other-half-chiropractic-workshop-students.html) presented the workshop as a running series: “LIVE · Monthly workshops”, “Live sessions every month”, “12 Monthly Sessions”, “12 workshops per year”, “50+ Attendees Per Session”, “50+ Students Per Cohort”, “We keep cohorts small (50 students max)”, “Seats fill quickly”, “Don’t miss the next workshop”, “Register For Next Workshop”, a certificate that “Some schools accept … for continuing education hours”, a “workshop-preview.mp4” preview with no video behind it, and “Live on campus and online every month” in its search description. It also carried six attendee testimonials, counted among the thirty-seven above.
  • Eight demonstration pages of the student portal and admin console (submissions.html, admin.html, lessons-admin.html, module.html, lesson.html, lessons.html, workbook.html, settings.html) were public. They showed invented students and activity as if real, for example “142 Students” and “Watched by 47 students this week · Avg completion: 89%”, with no notice that the data was invented.
What was wrong

None of the thirty-seven testimonials has a source. We have no record of any of these people saying these words, and they should never have been published. They were placeholder copy presented as real people. The about page said so on its face: under its three testimonials, in small print, it read “[ SAMPLE TESTIMONIALS — REPLACE WITH REAL QUOTES ]”. A note in the source of pre-chiro-navigator.html said its quotes should be verified against real records before publishing. They never were.

Several described modules that no cohort has taken. Module 3’s letter templates, Module 7, the NBCE preparation and the Chiro Student modules were praised as if students had completed them. They have not: the founding cohort is planned for Q1 2027, and no student has been through the program. The five-star ratings were claims too, and they had no source either. There were no reviews to rate.

The 94% acceptance rate, the 1,200+ students, the “highest-rated lesson” and the student success stories had no source, for a program no student has completed. The row of logos implied an association with those institutions and that publication that we cannot source; it carried its own small-print note, “[ Replace with real logos / school names — placeholder set ]”. No Contributor Spotlight exists. The contribute form was never connected to anything, so the 48-hour promise could not be kept for anyone who used it.

The claims in our own voice described students, results and testing that no cohort could have produced. No module was field-tested with students before filming, and we have no record of any such test. There are not 1,000 students using ChiroTrack. No student has sent a letter with the M3 templates, reported anything about a lesson, or taken M1 and gone on to M2, and no forum has any students in it yet. The Other Half workshop has never run. There have been no sessions, no attendees and no cohorts, so every attendance, cohort and frequency figure on its page was false, as were its six testimonials. No school has accepted its certificate, because none has been issued. The demonstration pages presented invented people and numbers as a working product.

What replaced it

All thirty-seven testimonials and their star ratings were removed, along with the sections that held them. The acceptance-rate and student-count claims, the lesson rating, the success-stories offer, the logo row, the Contributor Spotlight line and the 48-hour promise were removed. The form on contribute.html still does not send submissions.

The field-testing claims, the forum claims, the week-1 results, the 1,000+ figures and avatars, the claims about what students do and report, the workshop figures and the “Tangible Results” card were removed. The workshop page was rewritten as an announcement of its first session: what it is, who it is for, what happens in the session, and that it has not run before. Its price and schedule were not changed in this correction. Descriptions of the forum and Live Q&A now say questions “can be raised” there, not that they have come up. “Every framework was pressure-tested in practice” stays: it refers to Dr. Glass’s own clinical practice, not to students. The eight demonstration pages were taken off the site entirely.

Episodes that do not exist, and publishing that was not happening

Corrected September 23, 2026 · podcast.html and seven other pages · published from April 2, 2026

What was published

On the podcast page, a “Latest Episodes” list of nine numbered episodes dated February 26 to May 1, 2026:

  • Ep 142, “How Dr. Sarah K Built a Cash-Based Practice in 2 Years”, May 1, 2026
  • Ep 141, “The Upper Cervical Practitioner Who Won’t Adjust Below C2”, April 22, 2026
  • Ep 140, “What I Wish I Knew Before Choosing Palmer”, April 17, 2026
  • Ep 139, “The 87-Year-Old DC Still Practicing in Brooklyn”, April 8, 2026
  • Ep 138, “Lien-Based PI Practice: What Schools Don’t Teach”, April 3, 2026
  • Ep 137, “Why Network Spinal Doesn’t Look Like Chiropractic”, March 25, 2026
  • Ep 136, “Trauma-Informed Chiropractic in a Public Health Setting”, March 19, 2026
  • Ep 135, “First Quarter Survival: 3 Recent Grads Speak Plainly”, March 11, 2026
  • Ep 134, “The Billing Conversation Nobody Wants to Have in School”, February 26, 2026

The same page said “New ones drop weekly”, showed a “Live Feed” indicator, offered a “Weekly Dispatch” sign-up (“New practitioner conversations drop weekly”), and had Apple Podcasts, Spotify and RSS buttons.

Elsewhere on the site:

  • The workbook preview (workbook.html) showed a quotation attributed to “Dr. Mariah Chen · Episode 142 · 04:32”, and listed “Ep 142 — Dr. Mariah Chen” as a reference. Two admin page previews (admin.html, lessons-admin.html) listed the same reference.
  • The module preview (module.html) listed three “compilation clips”: “Dr. Foster” (Ep 128), “Dr. Subramanian” (Ep 097) and “Dr. Reyes” (Ep 156).
  • The student guide (pre-chiropractic-student-guide.html) showed “Your Matched Mentors”: “Dr. James Thornton, DC” (EP 312), “Dr. Aaliyah Johnson, DC” (EP 198) and “Dr. Wade Port, DC”, described as a “Multi-location owner” (EP 276), plus a scheduled “1-on-1 Mentorship” with “Dr. Thornton”.
  • The about page offered a “Weekly Dispatch” of “Weekly ChiroTrack updates”. The free resources page said “Updated weekly”.
What was wrong

None of those episodes exists. The interview series was never numbered. It ran from 2020 to 2024, 336 episodes, and nothing has been published in it since July 26, 2024. The Mariah Chen quotation, its episode and the three compilation clips do not exist in the series.

Dr. Wade Port is the name of a guest in two published episodes. The mentor role and episode number shown were invented, and we have no record that this guest agreed to be listed as a mentor. Neither “Dr. James Thornton” nor “Dr. Aaliyah Johnson” appears in the series.

Nothing was being published weekly. The sign-up buttons on the podcast and about pages were not connected to anything, the free resources page was not updated weekly, and the Apple Podcasts, Spotify and RSS buttons led nowhere.

What replaced it

The podcast page now says what is true: the series ran from 2020 to 2024, 336 recorded conversations, and every episode is on the ChiroTrack YouTube channel, which it links to. The invented episode list, the weekly claims, the sign-up blocks and the dead platform buttons were removed. The Mariah Chen quotation and references, the three clips, the matched-mentors panel and the invented mentorship session were removed from the other pages. The workbook, module and admin preview pages were later taken off the site entirely (see the entry above).

Interview clips shown without the guests’ permission

Corrected September 23, 2026 · 14 pages · published September 22, 2026

What was published

Nineteen videos from the interview series, including two full episodes and seventeen short clips of guests, were embedded on 14 pages written for students: business-majors.html, chiropractic-assistants.html, healthcare-workers.html (2), high-school-athletes.html, international-students.html (2 full episodes), kinesiology-majors.html, massage-therapists.html (2), personal-trainers.html, shadowing-a-chiropractor.html, student-athletes.html, yoga-teachers.html (2), and three blog posts: the adjusting-artist guide (2), “Surviving Chiropractic School” and “Things I Wish I Knew as a Chiropractic Student”.

What was wrong

Our letter to the people we interviewed (update.html) promises: “nothing you said in our interview goes in front of students until you’ve given written permission.” Our directory page says nobody from the archive is published “without being asked again and saying yes.” No guest had given that permission for any of these clips, and the site had no working way to give it. We broke our own rule.

What replaced it

Every one of the nineteen videos was removed from all fourteen pages. Each page’s own text stands without them. A guest’s material returns only if that guest gives written permission. The episodes themselves remain on the ChiroTrack YouTube channel as they were published.

How this is checked now

Since September 23, 2026, the site will not publish if any page carries a testimonial or quotation that cannot be traced to a source, a reference to an episode that does not exist, or a video from the interview series without the recorded permission of the person in it.